Three talking points:
1. “When schools focus solely on at-risk behaviors exhibited by students, they tend to work reactively rather than proactivity.” This makes me think of punishments for poor behavior or lower grades. For example, teachers or parents reacting to something undesirable after it occurs rather that supporting and building up the student so they would be less likely to struggle.
2. The Search Institute’s research revealed that the greater amount of assets leads to less risky behaviors. I found it interesting that there was a list of 40 assets which could be categorized onto internal and external. A few examples of internal assets listed are: reading for pleasure, responsibility, planning and decision making, and self esteem. Some external assets are: family support, safety, adult role models, positive peer influences, and youth programs. I included the link below.
3. I thought it was sad that research indicated that sixth graders only had 22 of the 40 assets and decreases as they age. It showed the greatest drop around junior high school years. This brought to mind my son’s school experience, He was in the public school system for his entire career. When he first started out, he loved attending. He did very well and was described by his teachers as a model student. Right around fifth and sixth grade, his attitude towards school began to change. He didn’t like going as much and his performance began to decline. He received a wider range of grades and didn’t seem to care about them. He also started complaining about his teachers. When he entered junior high, he continued to struggle with his grades, began joking and clowning around in many of his classes, not completing his work, and did not like many of the teachers. High school was the same. I wonder how different his experience would have been and how it would have impacted his future had he experienced more of an asset building model.
Argument Statement:
Renkly and Bertolini argue that schools would work much better if they placed less attention on what students were doing wrong and more emphasis on their positive attributes. Providing a supportive learning environment would result in better behavior and improved learning outcomes.
Connections:
When reading this text, I thought about the previous reading, The Broken Model and how students’ were graded and filtered out based on test scores rather than true learning and understanding of the material. They were labeled and placed into categories based on scores which prevented some of reaching their full potential and success.
Links:
What is Assets-Based Teaching and How Does It Enable Equity Practices in College Classrooms?
Using the lens of the Search Institute’s “40 Developmental Assets” to support student outcomes
40 Developmental Assets
https://www.greatkidsallencounty.org/resources-40-developmental-assets